Credit Wars in Infrastructure Projects
Credit Wars in
Infrastructure Projects
“In Jammu and
Kashmir routine development works are increasingly exaggerated as personal or
political achievements by individuals rushing to claim credit. This culture
distorts facts, weakens accountability and poses a quiet but serious danger to society.”
Peerzada Mohsin Shafi
In Jammu and Kashmir
a strange and worrying culture has steadily grown where even the smallest hint
of infrastructure development becomes a race for personal credit. A tender
notice uploaded quietly by a department, a routine correspondence by an
official or meeting with the relevant minister is enough to trigger a flood of
claims. Everyone suddenly appears to be the architect of progress. Local power
brokers, self-declared activists, social media commentators and political
workers rush forward to announce that this happened because of them.
Development, instead of being understood as a structured institutional process,
is turned into a competitive spectacle of self-praise.
This phenomenon
becomes louder and more aggressive when political parties or some so called
social activists step in. The narrative is carefully crafted that the project
was stalled for years and only moved because of one leader’s intervention.
Routine administrative actions are presented as extraordinary political
achievements. A simple correspondence seeking information is exaggerated as
pressure politics. A meeting with a departmental officer is projected as a
turning point that changed the destiny of the area.
What is deliberately
hidden in this process is how development actually works. Projects are
conceived through planning exercises, technical surveys, feasibility reports
and budget allocations. Files move through departments, approvals are granted
at multiple levels and timelines are fixed long before anyone poses for a
photograph. Most works that are now being claimed by individuals were already
part of approved plans. But touts rely on public ignorance of these processes.
They give super hype to ordinary communications and convince people that
nothing moves without their leader’s will. This distortion of facts is not
accidental. It is a calculated attempt to convert public works into personal favors.
The danger of this
trend is deep and long lasting. When credit is falsely claimed accountability
disappears. If a project is delayed tomorrow those who owned it today will
quietly distance themselves. If quality is compromised blame will be shifted to
departments or conspiracies. Public discourse shifts from questioning
performance to defending personalities. Development becomes less about delivery
and more about managing perception. Over time this weakens institutions because
processes are overshadowed by individuals who have no formal responsibility for
execution.
The situation often
descends into absurdity. If a department floats a tender for even a small
toilet complex hundreds of people rush to claim that it happened because of
them. Social media fills with congratulatory posts and exaggerated praise.
Routine works that are part of annual plans are celebrated like historic
milestones. Very few bother to check facts, understand scope or ask whether the
work will actually be completed on time. Celebration begins at the announcement
stage and by the time the work stalls or fails public memory has already moved
on to the next claim.
Such behaviour is
not harmless. It slowly damages public sense and social maturity. When people
are trained to celebrate announcements instead of outcomes they stop demanding
results. When applause is given freely for starting rather than finishing there
is little incentive to complete projects properly. This culture also
discourages honest officials and engineers who work quietly within the system.
Their years of effort are overshadowed by those who arrive at the last moment
to take credit. Over time professionalism gives way to showmanship and
governance becomes a performance.
History offers
enough warnings about this mindset. Many past civilizations declined not
because they lacked resources but because truth was replaced by flattery and
propaganda. Courts and administrations where rulers were praised for routine
acts slowly lost touch with reality. Systems decayed because honest feedback
was drowned in applause. Societies that survived were those that valued
institutions, records and accountability over personal glory. The lesson is
simple. When exaggeration becomes normal decline follows silently.
In Jammu and Kashmir
this culture carries additional risks due to various reasons. Development here
must be handled with transparency and responsibility. Turning public projects
into partisan trophies deepens divisions. A road or a bridge stop being a
shared public good and becomes a symbol of political loyalty. Those outside the
narrative feel excluded while those inside feel entitled. This weakens social
cohesion and fuels unnecessary rivalry over basic amenities.
Media also bears
responsibility in this ecosystem. When press releases and claims are published
without verification hype replaces journalism. Headlines repeat narratives
without explaining context. The public is rarely told whether a project was
already sanctioned, who is funding it or what the timeline is. This creates an
environment where exaggeration thrives and truth struggles to survive. A
healthy society needs media that educates citizens about processes not media
that amplifies personal claims. It must be clarified that seeking development
and raising public issues is not wrong. Elected representatives are expected to
advocate for their constituencies. But there is a clear difference between
genuine advocacy and opportunistic appropriation. Genuine advocacy acknowledges
institutions and collective effort. Opportunistic credit grabbing erases them.
The former strengthens democracy while the latter weakens it.
Citizens too must
introspect. Not every sanction is a victory. Not every tender is
transformation. Development is often slow and unglamorous. It is measured in
quality, durability and service delivery. A hospital matters only when doctors
are present and equipment works. A road matters only when it lasts beyond one
season. Premature celebration only creates false expectations and eventual
disappointment.
Ultimately the real
question should not be who brought what but how well it serves the people.
Public works are funded by public money and executed by public institutions.
They are not gifts from individuals. A bridge that stands strong for decades
matters far more than a banner that lasts a day. When society learns to value
substance over spectacle the market for false credit will shrink. Until then
the scramble will continue, narratives will clash and truth will remain buried
under applause. Recognizing this reality is essential if Jammu and Kashmir is
to move forward with dignity, patience and genuine progress.
