Stanford’s 2 Percent List- Understanding the Hype and Reality
Stanford’s
2 Percent List
Understanding
the Hype and Reality
“The so-called “Stanford top 2% scientists” list often reported in
Kashmir is widely misunderstood as an official award or endorsement from
Stanford University. In reality, it's a citation-based database created by
researchers affiliated with Stanford, reflecting research visibility not
quality or innovation.
Peerzada Mohsin Shafi
|
E |
very few months social media in Kashmir lights up
with the same kind of headline that a professor or researcher from the Valley
has been named among the top two percent scientists in the world by Stanford
University. Pictures certificates and congratulations follow. Universities
issue press notes and newspapers carry the story as if Stanford University
itself has selected and honoured the individual. To the common reader it sounds
like an international award or a formal endorsement from one of the world’s top
universities. Yet the truth is much simpler and far less glamorous. The
so-called Stanford list is not an award not a ranking prepared by the
university and not a certificate issued by it. It is a citation database
created by a few researchers affiliated with Stanford who analyse scientific
publication records from Scopus which is Elsevier’s global database of research
articles. The team led by Professor John Ioannidis compiles what is called a
standardized citation indicator dataset. This dataset measures how often
scientists’ works are cited by other researchers. It combines total citations
h-index citations as single first or last author and other numbers into what
they call a composite score or c score. Based on that score scientists who fall
in the top two percent of their specific discipline in terms of citation impact
are listed.
This means the list does not judge how good or
original the research is. It does not measure innovation quality or real-world
benefit. It only reflects how visible a scientist’s work is in the research
literature. A scientist working in a large field such as medicine or computer
science will naturally gather more citations than someone working in a small
field such as glaciology or local geology. So being in the top two percent of
one field does not compare directly with the same position in another. But such
details are often ignored in local reporting. The moment the new list is
released every year universities in Kashmir release posters and news items
proudly announcing that their faculty members have been named in the Stanford
University top two percent list. The media publishes it without context and the
public takes it as a mark of global excellence. Yet Stanford University as an
institution neither prepares nor endorses this list. The authors of the study
work at Stanford but the project is not an official Stanford programme. The
misunderstanding spreads because the name Stanford carries such prestige that
attaching it to anything makes it sound like a formal recognition.
In Kashmir unnecessary hype is being created.
Citation numbers are not a perfect reflection of contribution. Some scientists
gain large citations through teamwork or writing review papers while others
doing deep or applied work may receive fewer citations but contribute more
meaningfully to their field or society. Citation databases can also be
distorted by self citations or citation rings where groups of authors cite each
other repeatedly. Even Professor Ioannidis himself has clarified that the
dataset should not be used as a ranking of the best scientists in the world but
as a tool to study citation patterns.
The two percent list is a medal. It is a
statistical recognition that a scientist’s work has been cited more often than
most others in the same field. It reflects reach not necessarily depth. In the
long run the real strength of science in Kashmir will not be measured by how
many appear on such lists but by how much research improves lives knowledge and
environment in the region. Headlines will fade but honest work remains. So the
next time we see a name from Kashmir on the so called Stanford University list
we should remember what it actually stands for. It is a count of citations not
a crown of excellence and understanding that difference is what makes both
science and society stronger.
*****************
