Healthcare Needs Healing Too
Healthcare
Needs Healing Too
“As
violence and mistrust rise, Kashmir’s medical community must look inward and
rebuild its bond with society.
Peerzada
Mohsin Shafi
In recent weeks, there has been an overwhelming
buzz surrounding the medical community in Kashmir, sparked by the unfortunate
incident at SMHS Hospital Srinagar and GMC Jammu where an attendant allegedly
slapped and misbehaved with a doctor on duty. The impact of this event has
reverberated not only in daily conversations but across social media platforms
as well, with people passionately debating the actions and reactions that
followed. The strike by doctors, the closure of the emergency section at the
tertiary hospital and the inquiry set up by the Health Ministry to determine
whether the emergency block functioned during the strike have all contributed
to an ongoing public discourse. The inquiry is expected to deliver its findings
in coming days, shedding light on the whole scenario and importantly whether
emergency care was compromised during this period of protest. While such
incidents are not new to Kashmir, they raise significant questions about the
underlying reasons for such tensions in the healthcare system.
Since childhood, we are taught that humans are
social beings, dependent on each other for various aspects of life. The old
adage in Kashmiri “Kunn chu shuban sirf Khudaa”,
meaning roughly “Only God is meant to be alone,” reflects this deeply rooted
belief that no one can exist in isolation. This principle holds true in every
aspect of life, from a child depending on their parents, to the elderly relying
on their children and patients placing their trust in doctors. Every societal
role is interdependent and interconnected, which means no profession should be
undervalued or treated with less regard.
Each profession contributes significantly to the
community and all members of society have responsibilities to each other. There
is no hierarchy of human worth based on occupation. Every human being is
susceptible to error and making mistakes is an intrinsic part of being human.
Even the first prophet, Adam PBUH, made a mistake that led to his fall from
paradise. Therefore, recognizing and learning from our mistakes is fundamental
to growth and progress.
In everyday life, mistakes happen in many
professions. Engineers sometimes make errors that lead to the collapse of
bridges or buildings. Similarly, in the legal profession, errors can result in
miscarriages of justice. These mistakes are met with investigations, public
scrutiny and corrective measures. The medical profession should not be exempt
from this same standard. However, the issue arises when certain professionals,
especially doctors, begin to assume an unchallenged position of superiority.
While some doctors undoubtedly work tirelessly for the benefit of their
patients and communities, others fall into a mindset where they believe their
qualifications or societal status exempt them from scrutiny.
This sense of superiority is not an abstract idea
or hypothetical, but rather an observable reality in some segments of the
medical community. It is clear that not all doctors share this attitude, but a
significant number do seem to regard themselves as superior based on their
education, experience and societal status. Many doctors are praised by patients
for their exceptional work and dedication which is a selfless act deserving of
recognition. However, while such gestures are admirable, they should not absolve
doctors from their responsibility to listen to and respect patients when things
go wrong. It is important to remember that patients are not irrational and
their concerns deserve to be heard and addressed.
While doctors are often lauded for their
contributions to society, it is equally important to recognize that they, too,
can make mistakes. The issue arises when some doctors, rather than
acknowledging their mistakes, act defensively and refuse to accept criticism. Following the SMHS incident,
numerous articles have appeared in both local newspapers and on social media
where doctors have defended their actions, portraying themselves as faultless
professionals who cannot err. One particular doctor even suggested on
Facebook that the public no longer needed doctors, advising them instead to
follow a "good diet." Another article published in a prominent local
newspaper claimed that the assault on doctors was a societal emergency, arguing
that doctors, despite their efforts to heal, face hostility in return. While
violence against any individual is indefensible and must be condemned, it is
equally important to reflect on the broader dynamics at play.
The central question is why is it assumed that
patients and their families are always in the wrong? These are certain reasons
behind every action. A troubling inconsistency arises when the same doctors who
exhibit rudeness and dismissiveness in government hospitals behave with
courtesy and professionalism in private clinics. This stark contrast deserves introspection.
There are many instances where a patient,
dissatisfied with their treatment, seeks a second opinion. In such cases, the
second doctor not only dismisses the previous doctor’s prescription but often
goes as far as openly criticizing the initial treatment. In some extreme
situations, the second doctor may even tear up the prescription, discards and throws
the medicine, especially when the patient presents it in hand, as is common in
Kashmir. Imagine a poor patient who has painstakingly purchased the medicine with
their hard-earned money, only to watch it being thrown away by doctor without
any fault of their own. Such actions are not only unprofessional but deeply
disrespectful and hurtful to the patient. What, then, do doctors expect in
return gratitude or anger? This behaviour is neither ethical nor respectful and
it raises serious concerns about the fundamental dignity every patient
deserves. Doctors have a responsibility to maintain professionalism, not just
through their medical expertise but also in their interactions with patients.
Disrespect and a lack of empathy erode the trust essential to the
patient-doctor relationship. Compassion and dignity should be the foundation of
medical practice, irrespective of the setting or circumstances.
I have personally witnessed instances where
doctors, in private practice, are courteous and attentive, yet in public
settings, they display open disdain. One particular example that stands out is
an orthopaedic specialist treated even elderly patients with blatant
disrespect. Yet, in his private clinic, he is composed and professional. This
hypocrisy is not an isolated case. In fact, some doctors in the region have
been accused of referring patients from government hospitals to private nursing
homes for surgeries, creating a system of inflated medical costs. Just a few
days ago, the government blacklisted some doctors in the valley for engaging in
such unethical practices.
I am an eyewitness to a tragic incident involving
a five-year-old boy who on the pretext of hydrocele surgery underwent an
incision and stitching, purely to inflate medical bills under the PMJAY scheme.
This happened in the capital of J&K. When the child’s parents uncovered
this deception, their shock and anger were completely justified. My question to
the medical community is: what kind of response can a doctor expect from a
parent who discovers that their child was subjected to such exploitation? Can
anyone truly call that person a doctor who did not perform a legitimate
procedure but fabricated one simply to profit from the PMJAY scheme?
However, it is important to note that not all
doctors fall into this category. There are many who work with genuine care,
humility, and dedication. There are many examples yet I personally know reputed
gastroenterologist and paediatric surgeon of South Kashmir who instead of
private sector direct patients to government hospitals for surgery and other
interventions, ensuring that their patients receive care without unnecessary
financial strain. These doctors embody the values of professionalism, ethics,
and genuine service to the community.
The core message is unequivocal: patients are not
enemies, but human beings who are entitled to respect, dignity, and proper
medical care. The medical profession must acknowledge that mistakes are
inevitable, but they cannot be ignored or overlooked. When a doctor makes an
error, it does not place them beyond accountability. There is no room for
superiority or arrogance in medicine, or in any profession, for that matter.
Doctors must recognize that they are an integral part of society, not above it.
The unfortunate incident at SMHS Hospital serves
as a stark reminder of this truth. As we say in Kashmiri, "Yutaam ne
cxette aaseth kehn kormut, su katte aase gomut hang mang Bawre",
meaning roughly "Unless something is done to provoke him, one doesn’t go
mad." This sentiment holds relevance here. While the inquiry into the SMHS
incident is still ongoing, deep down, everyone knows the truth.
Incidents like these underscore the pressing need
for introspection and reform within the medical community. Both patients and
doctors must embrace their shared responsibility to foster a healthy,
respectful relationship, one that promotes mutual understanding and trust.
The world has changed. People are more informed,
more vocal and more connected than ever before. The medical profession must
adapt to this new reality and recognize that accountability is not an attack on
their dignity but a necessary step towards improving the system for all. Only
then will trust be restored, and the true purpose of medicine can be fully
realized.